
Data Over Cable and the @Home Network
This page is not yet completed.
Table of Contents
About @HOME
- Silicon Valley Startup
- Formed by TCI and Kleiner-Perkins
- Partners with multiple Cable MSO's
Service Goal
Deliever scaleable high performance network services over
broadband cable to millions of homes.
Cable is Unique
- Widely deployed to millions of homes
- Currently the highest bandwidth of any pervasive infrastruture
- Cable is not connection oriented -- the network can be connected all the time
- This supports a flat-rate pricing modern more naturally than current telco.
- Modern Hybrid Fiber-Coax (HFC) infrastructure and can support very cost effective multi-service delivery
Infrastucture
Headend <--> FM over fiber <--> Fiber to Electrical conversion <--> coax to the home
Cable has the incentive
- DBS is a better way of delivering one-way video.
- No existing data services to cannibalize.
- Have local field force in the community.
- Data transport is a relativity low-cost add-on to modem HFC infrastructure.
- Data services can help provide better support for other serivces.
@Home service to consumer
- Cable modem delivers data from the RF plant
- 10Mbps Ethernet (10-Base-T) as the interface providing IP dialtone
- Home LAN's supported
- Software to make it all work on multiple platforms (NetScape is involved)
Information Services
- @Home is not a content provider, but works with them.
- @Home works non-exclusively with content partners to advance broadband content
- Must push local content in order to be relevant to most consumers
- @Home will provide directory servicess
- Also, the usual services: News/mail, etc
Architectural Issues
How to proactively manage reliable network communications to the User?
@Home Core Assertions
- Cannot scale the system just by adding communications capacity
- Network must cache and replicate content to provide support "fanout"
- Multicasting in the proper model for many services, not HTTP
- Computing responsibilities must be distributed even to the client (e.g. Java)
- Must control topology to scale
- KISS wins
Architecture
- ATM Services Backbone connected to various NAPS
[ATM is available and fast, not bright.]
- Regional Networks serving a number of cable operators
- Headends at the various cable operators
- Home (768 Kbps from the home, 27 megabits/second to the home)
Subscriber Installation
CATV Line -- > Splitter --> TV
--> Cable Modem -- > PC (maybe wireless)
Caching Service Benefits
- Provides superios service to users since data is coming from a local server
- Greatly reduces network load up from the head end system (e.g. the broader
Internet
- Provides much greater network management information
- Can potentially help implement parental control filtering
Replicating Service
- Mirrors data from content providers in every or serveral regions
- Reduces load on Backbone and "Internet"
- Can execute scripts on @Home serviers through JavaScript capabilities
- Can bill through @Home backoffice for services or content
- Also provides email, News, etc...service
Multicasting
- Systems supports multicasting end-to-end using standard Internet protocols
- Greatly eases scaling issues for dynamic content, especially when coupled with
Java in browser
- Network supports "cloning" of data with different scopes
- Will be one-way multicast initially with 2-way support when modems have better
controls
Priortization
- @Home infrastructure support priority queuing of traffic
- Perimeter routers set IP precedence
- Internal servers can set precedence
Cable Modems
- Currently immature technology
- Will be manufactured in large volume starting in 1996
- Many large manufacturers are getting into this business
- No real standards for interoperability
- New consortiums being formed to drive standards
First Award
- Motorola awared first contract from TCI for cable modems
- 200,000 modems to TCI in 1996 with additional MSO's piggybacking
- 27Mbps down, 768 Kbps up after FEC
- Software downloadable, and network savvy
- HFC patch encrypted
Tentative Schedule
- Deploy in Sunnyvale Ca in 2Q96
- Aggresively deply though 1996 on a national and possibly international basis
- Pricing targeting at $30-$40/month, flat-rate
- @Work and @School businesses, too.
Questions
Can you send ip from @Home to other places on the Internet? Yes, but it
may not be as fast as using @Home services. An on-line service is perceived
as performing better than the Internet.
How will address assignment handled? DHCP will be used, but static addressing
will be done. DHCP is used to make renumbering easy, not to share addressing.
CIDR addressing will be used inside as well as outside the network.
How will content providers get stats on the information that is used?
- Expires field can be used.
- Other Methods
What about putting a server at home?
This will be cost driven. The modem systems will arbitrate access such that
no one will be able get all bandwidth at a time.
Can the corporate culture of the cable industry be modified such that the
critically of the data is realized? Some people in the cable company think
they can deliver dramatically better service.
In locations where the hybrid cable system is not available, will @Home work?
Yes, if the number of subscribers is small. At the end of this year, over
35% of the cable plants will be adapted to HFC.
How will folks on @Home be able to access corporate network? It is really up
the the companies to do this. @Home will be transparent to this as any other
IP provider is. Alternatively, corporation can get direct connections to
@Home.
Will @Home support Internet Phone? @Home is not going to prohibit the use
of Internet Phone, but is not going to institutionalize it at this time.
What IP address space will be used by @Home?
@Home is using Net 24 for its allocation.